Too many false accusations and errors in MR TONDO'S book. MR TONDO's book is defiantly not inspired.

Introduction page 22. A FALSE ACCUSATION Quote-"James had insufficient data. The Jerusalem Bishop, James, must never yet have seen any of Paul’s letters. For clearly, Paul’s letters directly affirm that Jews in Christ are “released” from the Law of Moses. (Romans 7:2.)"

Most people don't look up the references:
Know ye not, brethren, (for I speak to them that know the law,) how that the law hath dominion over a man as long as he liveth? For the woman which hath an husband is bound by the law to [her] husband so long as he liveth; but if the husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of [her] husband. So then if, while [her] husband liveth, she be married to another man, she shall be called an adulteress: but if her husband be dead, she is free from that law; so that she is no adulteress, though she be married to another man. (Rom 7:1-3)
THERE IS NOTHING HERE THAT DIRECTLY AFFIRMS THAT "Jews in Christ are “released” from the Law of Moses" WOW, Paul actually seems to imply that the Law of Moses for Marriage and Adultry even applies to the Gentiles... Exactly the opposite of MR TONDO'S accusation. - SO that is just one of his false accusations.

Funny that he uses Acts authoritatively when it suits his purpose, but here slams it.
Appendix C: The Easter Error
QUOTE- "with the word Easter in Acts 12:4. The King James translators thus believed Easter was synonymous with Passover. Why was this?"

And because he saw it pleased the Jews, he proceeded further to take Peter also. (Then were the days of unleavened bread.) And when he had apprehended him, he put [him] in prison, and delivered [him] to four quaternions of soldiers to keep him; intending after Easter to bring him forth to the people. (Act 12:3-4)
I HAVE INCLUDED verse 3 because the KJV translators used it to interpret the passage, you see they knew that the "days of unleavened bread" follows the Passover, SO THE Passover WAS ALREADY PAST, and they also knew that Easter Follows the "days of unleavened bread" and that the Romans KEPT THE ASHTEROTH CELEBRATION and did not want to interrupt their celebration... SO YOU SEE THE ERROR IS MR TONDO'S and not the KJV translators.

MR TONDO'S main accusation seems to be that PAUL CONDONED THE IDEA THAT YOU COULD CONTINUE IN SIN AFTER SALVATION. IF you pick and choose your verses as does MR TONDO and modern day "THE LAW IS NAILED TO THE CROSS" Christianity you can believe that-but not if you take all of Pauls writings as a whole and in context. Consider the following examples:
For not the hearers of the law [are] just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified. (Rom 2:13)
Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law. (Rom 3:31)
Rom 6:1 What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?

SO THE WRITINGS OF MR TONDO OR PAUL? I'LL CHOOSE PAUL.

THE INTERPRETATION OF MR TONDO OR THE KJV TRANSLATORS? NOT MR TONDO.
MR TONDO FIRST ASKS YOU TO ACCEPT HIS WRITINGS AS CANNON - THEN ASKS YOU TO THROW AWAY MOST OF THE NEW TESTAMENT ON HIS REASONING. DON'T WASTE MY TIME.